After my original dissertation idea was determined to be unfeasible (by myself and my dissertation chair), I found myself struggling to find a topic that still fit the spirit of my work. Ideally, I would use the dissertation to create a theoretical base for my future study into narrative and trauma. This, however, is much easier said than done. The truth is that I don’t know how to write a theory without the use of real world applications. I imagine this has something to do with the way that I value theory as praxis and vice-versa, and, while I am by no means rejecting that belief, it’s making this dissertation thing kind of difficult. So, I’m trying to determine how, given the resources readily available to me, I can make a significant contribution to the field of trauma studies. (It’s times like these that make me think that I should have gone into psychology.) Here’s what I’m getting so far:
Thought #1: In the struggle to use writing as a way of healing, trauma survivors use unique rhetorical strategies for approaching their trauma. My sample set would be blogs, discussion forums, and memoirs, which I would examine using a combination of Burkean theories of identification and feminist content analysis. Using Jeanne Perrault’s idea of feminist autography, I would loosely categorize my samples as such, perhaps even going so far as to include theory within the scope of my research into autography. Perreault defines autography as “a writing whose effect is to bring into being a ‘self’ that the writer names ‘I,’ but whose parameters and boundaries resist the nomadic” (2)* While Perreault examines exclusively female-authored texts that have been published in print, I will be exploring mostly self-published blogs. Also, my focus will be on how the writing brings into being a self that has been formed in response to and in spite of trauma. I would also be looking into the Burkeian concepts of identification and consubstantiality as strategies for repairing the rift between self and other that is characteristic of trauma.
Thought#2: Focus on traumatic autography as a way of fighting back. Writing as a way of healing seems too optimistic, as though writing can make the trauma all better, which I do not think is true. Titles tend to help me focus, so I’d tentatively title this: “Writing/Fighting to Stay Alive: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival” or “Writing/Fighting to Survive: A Rhetorical Theory of Trauma”
Thought#3: [The most ambitious of these and the most difficult to put into concrete terms.]
My dissertation will serve as a basis for future research into memory, trauma, and narration. By first establishing a methodology based on a synthesis of feminist, psychological, and narrative theory, I will lay the groundwork for future study of the significance of language in identity formation and the effects of trauma on that process. For the purposes of this dissertation, I will be taking a small sampling of writing by those who have experienced traumas. These samples include: single-authored blogs, discussion forums, and memoir.
I want to create a theoretical basis for the argument that trauma is inherently a linguistic issue and that the loss of language is more than a symptom of the trauma; it is the trauma itself.
Okay. Here’s a start. Any feedback is appreciated.